HS2 Tunnel Could Damage Buckinghamshire Water Supply

HS2 Tunnel Could Damage Buckinghamshire Water Supply

According to geologist, Dr. Haydon Bailey, HS2’s current plans to construct the Chiltern tunnel could have an adverse effect on the regional water supply. Drilling one hole into the chalky ground could weaken the ground entirely, potentially risking ground failure.

 

The controversial HS2 rail scheme is the proposed high-speed rail link between London and the north of England, with the first phase linking London and Birmingham expected to be open in 2026. Whilst the project is expected to bridge the north-south divide and boost the economy, there is disagreement over the burden of cost on the taxpayer, the disruption to local communities and the environment.

 

Dr Bailey emphasised that if the tunnel goes ahead, its crown will have just “6m of competent chalk above it. Above this will be gravel and weathered rubbly chalk and there is certainly the threat of ground failure at the valley crossing point close to Chalfont St Giles.”

 

"The chances of the River Misbourne surviving this must be close to zero with the resulting loss of environmental benefits, wildlife habitats and public amenities.

 

"The chalk aquifer below the Misbourne valley is a major regional water supply, with numerous public water sources/boreholes in proximity to the proposed route. The public water supply at Chalfont St. Giles will certainly be jeopardised by the tunnel construction, and several other boreholes along the Misbourne valley at Amersham and Great Missenden will be threatened.

 

"In addition to this, 22 per cent of London's water supply is at risk should there be any damage to or pollution of the chalk aquifer in this and the adjacent Colne valleys.”

 

Representing Westminster’s High Speed Rail Committee, John Gladwin said a three bore tunnel was the only viable tunnel option which would considerably reduce the risk to the aquifier and eliminate damage as it’d be built deeper in more solid chalk.

 

 

A middle tunnel would also afford passengers extra safety in the case of an emergency or incident whereby a train has to be evacuated.

 

 

"We believe our case for a three bore tunnel is a matter of balancing the extra construction costs against the value of conserving the AONB and the environmental and other benefits, including increased passenger safety.

"Whilst this cost is quite considerable it represents only a tiny percentage of the overall construction cost while enabling the government to meet its commitments to conserve and enhance the AONB".

Please rate

Comments 

Name
Email
  Ctrl + Enter

Most Read

 FirstGroup to launch budget London to Edinburgh rail service

FirstGroup to launch budget London to Edinburgh rail service

FirstGroup is to launch a budget direct London-Edinburgh rail service next month, which it hopes will lure air passengers to the train as a cheaper and greener alternative.   The new service, branded Lumo, will have just one single class of travel and the company hopes it will carry more than

One year on: HS2 reaches 20,000 jobs landmark

One year on: HS2 reaches 20,000 jobs landmark

Companies right across the country are now forming part of HS2’s ever-growing supply chain. Contracts have already been awarded to over 2,200 businesses, 97% of which are UK-based.   HS2’s jobs boost is also benefitting those in need, with bespoke initiatives designed to

Record infrastructure pipeline investment to support future workforce

Record infrastructure pipeline investment to support future workforce

This infrastructure pipeline includes the projected future workforce demand based on planned investment in projects and programmes. The Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) estimates that in the four-year period up to 2024/25, over 425,000 individuals will be needed on an average

This website uses cookies to enhance your user experience. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of these cookies. See our Cookie Policy.